| 000 | 01225cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS39203 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15029 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aHowells, G.G. | ||
| 245 | _aWinners and losers in the family circle | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aLaw Society`s Gazette _v85(19) 18 May 1988, 13-19(4) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the meaning of `family` in the Rent Acts; the matter is important in order to decide if a person can succeed to a statutory tenancy. Refers particularly to Chios Property Investment Company Ltd v Lopez, (see Abstract 38814), where the respondent was held to have been a member of her deceased cohabitee`s family, although they had only been living together for two years and Sefton Holdings v Cairns, (see Abstract 39079), where the landlord`s appeal was successful and the 70-year old respondent lost the right to reside in the house which had been her home since 1941. | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1985 S113 | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1985 S87 | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1977 S2 1 B | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9813 _d9813 |
||