| 000 | 00879cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS37034 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u1717 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLewsley, C. | ||
| 245 | _aRate recovery and the burden of proof | ||
| 260 | _c1986 | ||
| 300 | _a(See abstract 37035) | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v26(7) October 1986 130-132(3) |
||
| 520 | _aReviews caselaw concerning burden of proof in distress proceedings for rate recovery , in the light of the recent decision Ratford and Haywood (Receivers and Managers of Sabre Tooling Ltd) v Northavon District Council in which the receivers of a company successfully proved that they were not in rateable occupation of the company`s premises. | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEAL | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c984 _d984 |
||