| 000 | 01092cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3125-05 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15070 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSubsidence | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1995) EGCS 105(1) (24/6/95) |
||
| 520 | _a"Higgins and another v Hatch & Fielding (a firm)" CA 9 June 1995. Surveyors noted in a survey slight settlement but advised further movement unlikely. Some years later the property owners, made aware of further settlement, pursued a claim only against their insurance company and not against the surveyors as well. CA maintained a reasonable person would have pursued both claims at the same time and upheld that subsequent action against surveyors was statute-barred. | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S14(A) | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSURVEYORS | ||
| 650 | _aVALUERS REPORT | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING SURVEYING-CASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9844 _d9844 |
||