| 000 | 01069cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3141-44 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15124 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCouncil not bound by policy or letter | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v3 November 1995, 36(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Southwark LBC v Logan" CA 31 October 1995. An appeal was dismissed against the decision to evict a family from a council property in which it had been squatting. The defence claimed Mrs Logan had a letter from the district housing manager stating they would not evict her unless it could be proved she had been offered another property. The judge concluded that the letter did not give the tenant right of occupation. | ||
| 650 | _aCOUNCIL HOUSES | ||
| 650 | _aESTOPPEL | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING AUTHORITIES | ||
| 650 | _aRACIAL HARASSMENT | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT OF OCCUPATION | ||
| 650 | _aSOUTHWARK LBC V LOGAN | ||
| 650 | _aSQUATTING | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9883 _d9883 |
||