000			01635cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS39215
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u15137
041			_aeng
245			_aBrodie Marshall and Co (Hotel Division) Ltd v Sharer and another
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1988] 19 EG 129-144(8)
520			_aQBD 4 March 1988. Claim by the estate agents (BM) for commission for the sale of a hotel. Although BM were not instrumental in the introduction of the purchasers, they relied on the terms of their 'sole selling agreement'. The claim was based in the alternative on two different clauses in the instructions; (1) if during the period of the sole selling agreement the vendor dealt with a prospective buyer who had not been introduced by BM, BM would still be entitled to commission as if they had effected the introduction. (2) Commission would be paid if BM introduced directly or indirectly a person who agreed to purchase the property at the specified price, or a price acceptable to the vendor. The property was eventually sold when the vendors instructed a commercial property consultant to sell the hotel. BM`s claim for commission was rejected by the vendors, who submitted that the BM`s instructions had been withdrawn before the sale.
650			_aBRODIE MARSHALL AND CO (HOTEL DIVISION) LTD V SHARER AND ANOTHER
650			_aEFFECTIVE CAUSE
650			_aESTATE AGENTS' COMMISSION
650			_aHOTELS
650			_aSOLE AGENTS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c9892 _d9892