| 000 | 01144cab a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55263 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15272 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aDunmore, K. | ||
| 245 | _aTrickle treat | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aHousing _v32(4) May 1996 22-23(2) |
||
| 520 | _aEvaluates the challenge fund which replaced a range of funding programmes set out to regenerate communities by attracting both, public and private finance. Discusses research findings which indicate that it offers an effective mechanism to meet needs but fails to ensure that funding sources have a significant impact on problems of decay. | ||
| 650 | _aCHALLENGE FUND | ||
| 650 | _aFUNDING SHORTFALL | ||
| 650 | _aFUNDING | ||
| 650 | _aHOLISTIC REGENERATION | ||
| 650 | _aPRIVATE FUNDING | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC FUNDING | ||
| 650 | _aREGENERATION PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION | ||
| 650 | _aREGENERATION PROGRAMMES | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN REGENERATION | ||
| 650 | _aVOLUNTARY AND PRIVATE SECTOR COOPERATION | ||
| 690 | _aURBAN RENEWAL | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9995 _d9995 |
||