The Nottinghamshire and City of Nottingham Fire Authority v Gladman Commercial Properties and Nottingham City Council
Language: English Publication details: 2011Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2011] EWHC 1918 (Ch), 20 April 2011. Should important evidence be allowed some time after a case has started?. Claimant NFA agreed to sell a fire station to Defendant and Part 20 Claimant G in 2007. Part 20 Defendant N agreed to sell adjacent land to G at the same time. G refused to complete both purchases, claiming fraudulent misrepresentation of the site by the agents of NFA and N. NFA and N wanted to call on evidence from a key witness after the beginning of the trial. G contended that it was unfair and costly to allow this late evidence. "Held": the evidence was allowed but G should be compensated for the delay.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 154603-2001 |
[2011] EWHC 1918 (Ch), 20 April 2011. Should important evidence be allowed some time after a case has started?. Claimant NFA agreed to sell a fire station to Defendant and Part 20 Claimant G in 2007. Part 20 Defendant N agreed to sell adjacent land to G at the same time. G refused to complete both purchases, claiming fraudulent misrepresentation of the site by the agents of NFA and N. NFA and N wanted to call on evidence from a key witness after the beginning of the trial. G contended that it was unfair and costly to allow this late evidence. "Held": the evidence was allowed but G should be compensated for the delay.