Step right in
Series: Building ; 269(8334) 28 May 2004, 52-53(2) | Contract Journal ; 423(6479) 9 June 2004, 18(1)Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Summary: Examines the recent case, "AWG Construction Ltd v Rockingham Motor Speedway Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 888 (TCC), [2004] TCLR 6.Here the two parties were in adjudication, but disagreements surfaced with AWG accusing R of placing new material and arguments which were very difficult to reply to. The adjudicator awarded £1.8m to R but the judge overturned this. The results of the adjudication lacked jurisdiction as issues outside of the dispute had been referred to. This had widened the issue, turning it into a different dispute. Argues that adjudicators should continue to allow further submissions but they should be within a strict timetable.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS67795 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 126419-1001 |
Examines the recent case, "AWG Construction Ltd v Rockingham Motor Speedway Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 888 (TCC), [2004] TCLR 6.Here the two parties were in adjudication, but disagreements surfaced with AWG accusing R of placing new material and arguments which were very difficult to reply to. The adjudicator awarded £1.8m to R but the judge overturned this. The results of the adjudication lacked jurisdiction as issues outside of the dispute had been referred to. This had widened the issue, turning it into a different dispute. Argues that adjudicators should continue to allow further submissions but they should be within a strict timetable.