Bank of Baroda v Rayarel
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; 1995 NPC 6Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 13 January 1995. A bank which insists on a warningclause in a second charge on a family home which states that the chargor had been advised firstly of the nature of the what she is doing and further that she has the right to take independent legal advice, and entrusts the execution of that document to a solicitor who was its sole channel of communication, is not liable under the principles of "Barclays Bank v O`Brien". NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1875 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 20098-1001 |
CA 13 January 1995. A bank which insists on a warningclause in a second charge on a family home which states that the chargor had been advised firstly of the nature of the what she is doing and further that she has the right to take independent legal advice, and entrusts the execution of that document to a solicitor who was its sole channel of communication, is not liable under the principles of "Barclays Bank v O`Brien". NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.