R v City of London C and another, ex parte Master Governers and Commonality of the Mystery of the Barbers of London
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 42 EG 156-159(4) (19/10/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: QBD 24 May 1996. The respondent council had granted planning permission for the second respondents to build a hall. The council covenanted not to interfere with light or air passing through any of the windows of the hall. Case concerns whether under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s237 a council has the right to remove covenants it imposed itself even though the site was being redeveloped. Case decided in favour of respondents.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS56080 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 20999-1001 |
QBD 24 May 1996. The respondent council had granted planning permission for the second respondents to build a hall. The council covenanted not to interfere with light or air passing through any of the windows of the hall. Case concerns whether under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s237 a council has the right to remove covenants it imposed itself even though the site was being redeveloped. Case decided in favour of respondents.