Undue influence
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 140(39) 18 October 1996, 1000-1001(2)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: Questions the Court of Appeal decision in "Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland v Burch" where an employee mortgaged her home at the insistence of her employer to extend the company`s overdraft limit. It was held that as a result of undue influence the bank could not make a claim against the employee even though it was her own choice not to take legal advice.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS56095 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 21141-1001 |
Questions the Court of Appeal decision in "Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland v Burch" where an employee mortgaged her home at the insistence of her employer to extend the company`s overdraft limit. It was held that as a result of undue influence the bank could not make a claim against the employee even though it was her own choice not to take legal advice.