Micrografix v Woking 8 Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 37 EG 179-180(2)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: ChD 19 May 1995. In 1990 the applicant tenants (M) were granted a 20 year lease of a building. A provision in clause 8 of the lease terms allowed M to determine the lease at the end of the 5th year by giving the landlords (W) no less than 12-months notice. On 21 January 1994, M sent a letter to W stating that they were determining the lease on 23 March 1995, however the notice had 23 March 1994 on it and referred to clause 8. M applied for a declaration that the lease would determine on 23 June 1995. W denied that the letter or notice would determine the lease. Held, application allowed; the notice was valid.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS53619 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 5387-1001 |
ChD 19 May 1995. In 1990 the applicant tenants (M) were granted a 20 year lease of a building. A provision in clause 8 of the lease terms allowed M to determine the lease at the end of the 5th year by giving the landlords (W) no less than 12-months notice. On 21 January 1994, M sent a letter to W stating that they were determining the lease on 23 March 1995, however the notice had 23 March 1994 on it and referred to clause 8. M applied for a declaration that the lease would determine on 23 June 1995. W denied that the letter or notice would determine the lease. Held, application allowed; the notice was valid.