Fit for use and occupation
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9222) 6 June 1992, 117(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the recent case "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki (Abs*****) which concerned the question of whether premises were `fit for immediate occupation and use` and the effects of this on rent review. Compares it to the cases "Jones v Sherwood Computer Services Ltd" and "Nikko Hotels (UK) Ltd v MEPC plc" (Abs44864).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS46600 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58829-1001 |
Discusses the recent case "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki (Abs*****) which concerned the question of whether premises were `fit for immediate occupation and use` and the effects of this on rent review. Compares it to the cases "Jones v Sherwood Computer Services Ltd" and "Nikko Hotels (UK) Ltd v MEPC plc" (Abs44864).