Good and another v Epping Forest DC
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; (1993) JPEL 127-133 (7)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: ChD 14 April 1992. The applicants sought a declaration that a s52 agreement in which the previous farm owner had covenanted that the dwellinghouse he wanted to build would be occupied by someone in agriculture and that the house would not be sold apart from the rest of the farm, was ultra vires, null and void. At issue was the use by the local planning authority of such a stringent s52 agreement rather than including these provisions in the condition for planning permission. The claim was dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47918 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64048-1001 |
ChD 14 April 1992. The applicants sought a declaration that a s52 agreement in which the previous farm owner had covenanted that the dwellinghouse he wanted to build would be occupied by someone in agriculture and that the house would not be sold apart from the rest of the farm, was ultra vires, null and void. At issue was the use by the local planning authority of such a stringent s52 agreement rather than including these provisions in the condition for planning permission. The claim was dismissed.