Tinsley v Milligan
Language: English Series: Weekly Law Reports ; (1993) WLR 126-153(28)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: HL 24 June 1993. The parties were joint owners of a house, registered solely in T`s name to facilitate a DSS fraud by M. Following an argument, T moved out, claimed possession and gave M notice to quit . T`s reliance on the illegality of the arrangement to prevent a successful defence was thwarted in the courts. HL upheld earlier decisions that the fraud was not sufficient to undermine M`s claim for a half share in her house. (see Abs46470)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS49060 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 69704-1001 |
HL 24 June 1993. The parties were joint owners of a house, registered solely in T`s name to facilitate a DSS fraud by M. Following an argument, T moved out, claimed possession and gave M notice to quit . T`s reliance on the illegality of the arrangement to prevent a successful defence was thwarted in the courts. HL upheld earlier decisions that the fraud was not sufficient to undermine M`s claim for a half share in her house. (see Abs46470)