Image from Google Jackets

P and S Platt Ltd v Crouch and another

Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2002] 45 EG 154 (CS)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: ChD 25 October 2002. Defendants (C) owned and operated an 18-bedroom hotel which offered river moorings for hotel guests. C sold the hotel as a going concern to claimant (P) for £700 000 and a further agreement was entered into whereby P obtained a option to buy the property belonging to the defendants for a further £200 000. The sale agreement and the subsequent conveyance of the hotel did not mention the mooring facility. P brought proceedings after C refused to allow hotel guests to use the river moorings and footbridge. P argued such use had been acquired by way of a grant to be implied by s62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The claim was allowed as it was stated that a right to moor boats to a mooring post and the right to place a notice or sign were establised categories of easement. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS66172 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 120637-1001

ChD 25 October 2002. Defendants (C) owned and operated an 18-bedroom hotel which offered river moorings for hotel guests. C sold the hotel as a going concern to claimant (P) for £700 000 and a further agreement was entered into whereby P obtained a option to buy the property belonging to the defendants for a further £200 000. The sale agreement and the subsequent conveyance of the hotel did not mention the mooring facility. P brought proceedings after C refused to allow hotel guests to use the river moorings and footbridge. P argued such use had been acquired by way of a grant to be implied by s62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The claim was allowed as it was stated that a right to moor boats to a mooring post and the right to place a notice or sign were establised categories of easement. View judgment at www.bailii.org.