Dinesh Dhamija [and] Tani Dhamija v Sunningdale Joineries Ltd, Lewandowski Willcox Limited, McBains Cooper Consulting Limited [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2010Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2010] EWHC 2396 (TCC) 10 September 2010. Considers whether a quantity surveyor has a duty to only value work that has been properly executed by a contractor and is not obviously defective. Suggests that such a duty was implied by the terms of the building contract which said that the quantity surveyor should include in his interim certificate a percentage based on the value of the works "properly executed". Concludes that the claim is unsustainable in this case because the QS complied with this duty.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 151980-2001 |
[2010] EWHC 2396 (TCC) 10 September 2010. Considers whether a quantity surveyor has a duty to only value work that has been properly executed by a contractor and is not obviously defective. Suggests that such a duty was implied by the terms of the building contract which said that the quantity surveyor should include in his interim certificate a percentage based on the value of the works "properly executed". Concludes that the claim is unsustainable in this case because the QS complied with this duty.