Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd
Language: English Publication details: 2012Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2012] UKSC 41, 10 October 2012. Two co-joined appeals concerned with the definition of a house for enfranchisement purposes under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(1). Properties used entirely for commercial purposes are not houses within the meaning of s2(1) whatever their original design or current appearance. Held: Appeal allowed. CA decisions overturned.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 157294-2001 |
[2012] UKSC 41, 10 October 2012. Two co-joined appeals concerned with the definition of a house for enfranchisement purposes under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(1). Properties used entirely for commercial purposes are not houses within the meaning of s2(1) whatever their original design or current appearance. Held: Appeal allowed. CA decisions overturned.