Chequepoint UK Ltd and Palisade Investments Ltd v SoS Envt and RB Kensington and Chelsea
Chequepoint UK Ltd and Palisade Investments Ltd v SoS Envt and RB Kensington and Chelsea
- 1996
- Property and Compensation Reports [1996] 72 P&CR 415-422(5) .
QBD 17 November 1995. The applicants had first put a sign above their shop in 1976 with consent, the colour changed in 1986 and it enjoyed deemed consent. In 1992 and 1993 the applicants applied for express consent for a new sign, the local planning authority issued a discontinuance notice. The applicants argued the authority had not taken into consideration various points when making their decision. Application dismissed.
ADVERTISEMENTS
CHEQUEPOINT UK LTD AND PALISADE INVESTMENTS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND
CONSERVATION AREAS
CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENTS
DEEMED CONSENT
DISCONTINUANCE NOTICE
EXPRESS CONSENT
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENT) REGULATIONS 1992
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
QBD 17 November 1995. The applicants had first put a sign above their shop in 1976 with consent, the colour changed in 1986 and it enjoyed deemed consent. In 1992 and 1993 the applicants applied for express consent for a new sign, the local planning authority issued a discontinuance notice. The applicants argued the authority had not taken into consideration various points when making their decision. Application dismissed.
ADVERTISEMENTS
CHEQUEPOINT UK LTD AND PALISADE INVESTMENTS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND
CONSERVATION AREAS
CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENTS
DEEMED CONSENT
DISCONTINUANCE NOTICE
EXPRESS CONSENT
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENT) REGULATIONS 1992
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288