Demolition and forfeiture
Turton, J.
Demolition and forfeiture - 1991 - Solicitors` Journal 135 (10) 15 March 1991, 326 (1) .
Discusses the decisions in Cambridge CC v SOS for Environment and Billson v Residential Apartments which have important implications for developers and landlords . The former held that demolition constitutes development, therefore requiring planning permission whilst the latter illustrates how effective forfeiture can be as a landlord`s remedy for breach of covenant .
BILLSON AND OTHERS V RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS LTD
COVENANT AGAINST ALTERATION
LANDLORD AND TENANT
LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
LEASES
MORTGAGEES
PEACEABLE RE-ENTRY
RELIEF
SECTION 146 NOTICES
Demolition and forfeiture - 1991 - Solicitors` Journal 135 (10) 15 March 1991, 326 (1) .
Discusses the decisions in Cambridge CC v SOS for Environment and Billson v Residential Apartments which have important implications for developers and landlords . The former held that demolition constitutes development, therefore requiring planning permission whilst the latter illustrates how effective forfeiture can be as a landlord`s remedy for breach of covenant .
BILLSON AND OTHERS V RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS LTD
COVENANT AGAINST ALTERATION
LANDLORD AND TENANT
LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
LEASES
MORTGAGEES
PEACEABLE RE-ENTRY
RELIEF
SECTION 146 NOTICES