Demolition and forfeiture
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 135 (10) 15 March 1991, 326 (1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the decisions in Cambridge CC v SOS for Environment and Billson v Residential Apartments which have important implications for developers and landlords . The former held that demolition constitutes development, therefore requiring planning permission whilst the latter illustrates how effective forfeiture can be as a landlord`s remedy for breach of covenant .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS44274 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 46301-1001 |
Discusses the decisions in Cambridge CC v SOS for Environment and Billson v Residential Apartments which have important implications for developers and landlords . The former held that demolition constitutes development, therefore requiring planning permission whilst the latter illustrates how effective forfeiture can be as a landlord`s remedy for breach of covenant .