Appeals from expert`s decisions
Appeals from expert`s decisions
- 1992
- Property Law Bulletin 13(4) September 1992, 27-28(2) .
Examines two recent High Court decisions "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki" 1992 and "PosTel Properties Ltd v Greenwell" 1992 upholding the principle that an expert`s decision is legal and binding and cannot be challenged in a court of law. However it is pointed out that in the `PosTel Properties` case, the parties would be entitled to apply to a court for a declaration as to the proper construction of the rent review clause.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
EXPERT
NIKKO HOTELS (UK) LTD V MEPC PLC
PONTSARN INVESTMENTS LTD V KANSALLIS-OSAKE-PANKKI
POSTEL PROPERTIES LTD V GREENWELL
RENT REVIEWS
Examines two recent High Court decisions "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki" 1992 and "PosTel Properties Ltd v Greenwell" 1992 upholding the principle that an expert`s decision is legal and binding and cannot be challenged in a court of law. However it is pointed out that in the `PosTel Properties` case, the parties would be entitled to apply to a court for a declaration as to the proper construction of the rent review clause.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
EXPERT
NIKKO HOTELS (UK) LTD V MEPC PLC
PONTSARN INVESTMENTS LTD V KANSALLIS-OSAKE-PANKKI
POSTEL PROPERTIES LTD V GREENWELL
RENT REVIEWS