Appeals from expert`s decisions
Language: English Series: Property Law Bulletin ; 13(4) September 1992, 27-28(2)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Examines two recent High Court decisions "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki" 1992 and "PosTel Properties Ltd v Greenwell" 1992 upholding the principle that an expert`s decision is legal and binding and cannot be challenged in a court of law. However it is pointed out that in the `PosTel Properties` case, the parties would be entitled to apply to a court for a declaration as to the proper construction of the rent review clause.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS47082 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 60747-1001 |
Examines two recent High Court decisions "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki" 1992 and "PosTel Properties Ltd v Greenwell" 1992 upholding the principle that an expert`s decision is legal and binding and cannot be challenged in a court of law. However it is pointed out that in the `PosTel Properties` case, the parties would be entitled to apply to a court for a declaration as to the proper construction of the rent review clause.