Synchronise watches
Bingham, T
Synchronise watches - 2001 - Building 266(8207) 23 November 2001, 50-51(2) .
Discusses the case "Sindall Ltd v Solland" which deals with two key issues. Sindall failed to give contract administrator Michael Edwards & Associates (MEA) enough time to respond to its complaint before starting adjudication which meant the first adjudicator had no right to adjudicate; MEA accused Sindall of not proceeding reasonably and diligently yet failed to give Sindall the correct extension of time which meant MEA had no grounds for giving notice.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
SINDALL LTD V SOLLAND
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
EXTENSION OF TIME
Synchronise watches - 2001 - Building 266(8207) 23 November 2001, 50-51(2) .
Discusses the case "Sindall Ltd v Solland" which deals with two key issues. Sindall failed to give contract administrator Michael Edwards & Associates (MEA) enough time to respond to its complaint before starting adjudication which meant the first adjudicator had no right to adjudicate; MEA accused Sindall of not proceeding reasonably and diligently yet failed to give Sindall the correct extension of time which meant MEA had no grounds for giving notice.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
SINDALL LTD V SOLLAND
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
EXTENSION OF TIME