The right side of planning
Edwards, M
The right side of planning - 2001 - Estates Gazette (0150) 15 December 2001, 85(1) .
Discusses the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the planning system following the "Alconbury" decision. Acknowledges the importance of "Alconbury" which addressed the compatibility of the call-in decision-making process with the European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 requirement to a fair hearing, but suggests that "Alconbury" has its limitations and should not represent the final word. Discusses a number of recent planning cases and suggests that cumulatively they may have a significant influence over how human rights issues will mould the planning system. Case law.
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
ALCONBURY
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
PLANNING SYSTEM
PLANNING INQUIRIES
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
R V RHONDDA CYNON TAFF BC EX P KATHRO AND OTHERS
FRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE & PENSIONS LTD V SOS TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS
SOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER
R V GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL EX P BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC AND ANOTHER
The right side of planning - 2001 - Estates Gazette (0150) 15 December 2001, 85(1) .
Discusses the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the planning system following the "Alconbury" decision. Acknowledges the importance of "Alconbury" which addressed the compatibility of the call-in decision-making process with the European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 requirement to a fair hearing, but suggests that "Alconbury" has its limitations and should not represent the final word. Discusses a number of recent planning cases and suggests that cumulatively they may have a significant influence over how human rights issues will mould the planning system. Case law.
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
ALCONBURY
CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
PLANNING SYSTEM
PLANNING INQUIRIES
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
R V RHONDDA CYNON TAFF BC EX P KATHRO AND OTHERS
FRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE & PENSIONS LTD V SOS TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS
SOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER
R V GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL EX P BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC AND ANOTHER