The right side of planning
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0150) 15 December 2001, 85(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
- ALCONBURY
- CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
- PLANNING SYSTEM
- PLANNING INQUIRIES
- PLANNING APPLICATIONS
- R V RHONDDA CYNON TAFF BC EX P KATHRO AND OTHERS
- FRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE & PENSIONS LTD V SOS TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS
- SOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER
- R V GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL EX P BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC AND ANOTHER
- Planning and development
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64938 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116278-1001 |
Discusses the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the planning system following the "Alconbury" decision. Acknowledges the importance of "Alconbury" which addressed the compatibility of the call-in decision-making process with the European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 requirement to a fair hearing, but suggests that "Alconbury" has its limitations and should not represent the final word. Discusses a number of recent planning cases and suggests that cumulatively they may have a significant influence over how human rights issues will mould the planning system. Case law.