A definite maybe
Murdoch, S.
A definite maybe - 2005 - Estates Gazette (0504) 5 February 2005, 201(1) .
Discusses how rights to use or occupy land can amount to a lease or a license, depending on whether there is an intention to confer exclusive possession of a defined area. Tenants should be aware of the differences as illustrated by two differently worded agreements in the case "Clear Channel UK Ltd v Manchester City Council" ([2004] EWHC (Ch)). The claimant argued that it held leases protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II which gives protection providing there is reasonable physical presence considering the nature of the premises and the business.
CLEAR CHANNEL UK LTD V MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
STREET V MOUNTFORD
CARDIOTHORACIC INSTITUTE V SHREWDCREST
OCCUPATION
A definite maybe - 2005 - Estates Gazette (0504) 5 February 2005, 201(1) .
Discusses how rights to use or occupy land can amount to a lease or a license, depending on whether there is an intention to confer exclusive possession of a defined area. Tenants should be aware of the differences as illustrated by two differently worded agreements in the case "Clear Channel UK Ltd v Manchester City Council" ([2004] EWHC (Ch)). The claimant argued that it held leases protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II which gives protection providing there is reasonable physical presence considering the nature of the premises and the business.
CLEAR CHANNEL UK LTD V MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
STREET V MOUNTFORD
CARDIOTHORACIC INSTITUTE V SHREWDCREST
OCCUPATION