A definite maybe
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0504) 5 February 2005, 201(1)Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Summary: Discusses how rights to use or occupy land can amount to a lease or a license, depending on whether there is an intention to confer exclusive possession of a defined area. Tenants should be aware of the differences as illustrated by two differently worded agreements in the case "Clear Channel UK Ltd v Manchester City Council" ([2004] EWHC (Ch)). The claimant argued that it held leases protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II which gives protection providing there is reasonable physical presence considering the nature of the premises and the business.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | X128892 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | A28892-1001 |
Discusses how rights to use or occupy land can amount to a lease or a license, depending on whether there is an intention to confer exclusive possession of a defined area. Tenants should be aware of the differences as illustrated by two differently worded agreements in the case "Clear Channel UK Ltd v Manchester City Council" ([2004] EWHC (Ch)). The claimant argued that it held leases protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II which gives protection providing there is reasonable physical presence considering the nature of the premises and the business.