Competing for the left-overs
Taylor, P.
Competing for the left-overs - 1996 - Property Finance & Development 8(2) February 1996, 10-11(2) .
Considers the rules distinguishing a fixture from a chattel, examines the competing rights of landlords, secured creditors and third parties over rights to assets of failed businesses. Refers to case law.
BUSINESS FAILURES
CHATTELS
CUNCLIFFE ENGINERING LTD V ENGLISH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE CORP
FIXTURE AND FITTINGS
HOBSON V GORRINGE
KENNEDY V SOS WALES
LANDLORDS FIXTURES
LAW OF DISTRESS AMENDMENT ACT 1909
SALFORD VAN HIRE (CONTRACTS) LTD V BOCHOLT DEVELOPMENTS LTD
SECURED CREDITORS
SEIZURE OF ASSETS
TENANTS FIXTURES
THIRD PARTIES
TSB BANK PLC V BOTHAM
UNSECURED CREDITORS
WHARFLAND LTD V SOUTH LONDON CO-OPERATIVE BUILDINGS LTD
Competing for the left-overs - 1996 - Property Finance & Development 8(2) February 1996, 10-11(2) .
Considers the rules distinguishing a fixture from a chattel, examines the competing rights of landlords, secured creditors and third parties over rights to assets of failed businesses. Refers to case law.
BUSINESS FAILURES
CHATTELS
CUNCLIFFE ENGINERING LTD V ENGLISH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE CORP
FIXTURE AND FITTINGS
HOBSON V GORRINGE
KENNEDY V SOS WALES
LANDLORDS FIXTURES
LAW OF DISTRESS AMENDMENT ACT 1909
SALFORD VAN HIRE (CONTRACTS) LTD V BOCHOLT DEVELOPMENTS LTD
SECURED CREDITORS
SEIZURE OF ASSETS
TENANTS FIXTURES
THIRD PARTIES
TSB BANK PLC V BOTHAM
UNSECURED CREDITORS
WHARFLAND LTD V SOUTH LONDON CO-OPERATIVE BUILDINGS LTD