Competing for the left-overs
Language: English Series: Property Finance & Development ; 8(2) February 1996, 10-11(2)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):- BUSINESS FAILURES
- CHATTELS
- CUNCLIFFE ENGINERING LTD V ENGLISH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE CORP
- FIXTURE AND FITTINGS
- HOBSON V GORRINGE
- KENNEDY V SOS WALES
- LANDLORDS FIXTURES
- LAW OF DISTRESS AMENDMENT ACT 1909
- SALFORD VAN HIRE (CONTRACTS) LTD V BOCHOLT DEVELOPMENTS LTD
- SECURED CREDITORS
- SEIZURE OF ASSETS
- TENANTS FIXTURES
- THIRD PARTIES
- TSB BANK PLC V BOTHAM
- UNSECURED CREDITORS
- WHARFLAND LTD V SOUTH LONDON CO-OPERATIVE BUILDINGS LTD
- PROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS54811 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 12359-1001 |
Considers the rules distinguishing a fixture from a chattel, examines the competing rights of landlords, secured creditors and third parties over rights to assets of failed businesses. Refers to case law.