Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Adams [electronic resource]
Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Adams [electronic resource]
- 2008
[2008] EWLands LRA_131_2007 19 March 2008. Case involved whether a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal had the right to extend the period for applying for permission to appeal a decision. Respondent's application fails: referring to Arrowdell v Coniston Court (North) Hove Ltd, the Tribunal found that the LVT does have the right to extend the period for appeals, but that a party who has asked for an extension after the period has elapsed has no right to have its application determined.
GROSVENOR ESTATE BELGRAVIA V ADAMS
COMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 S175
ARROWDELL V CONISTON COURT (NORTH) HOVE LTD
LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNALS (PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2003
England and Wales--1543-
[2008] EWLands LRA_131_2007 19 March 2008. Case involved whether a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal had the right to extend the period for applying for permission to appeal a decision. Respondent's application fails: referring to Arrowdell v Coniston Court (North) Hove Ltd, the Tribunal found that the LVT does have the right to extend the period for appeals, but that a party who has asked for an extension after the period has elapsed has no right to have its application determined.
GROSVENOR ESTATE BELGRAVIA V ADAMS
COMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 S175
ARROWDELL V CONISTON COURT (NORTH) HOVE LTD
LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNALS (PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2003
England and Wales--1543-