Get back to basics
Dollar, Peta
Get back to basics - 2009 - Estates Gazette (0926) 4 July 2009, 108-110(3) .
Property estoppel enables claimants to go to court to seek relief, but a recent House of Lords decision makes it obvious that estoppel use is becoming unprincipled. The following decisions suggests that courts should take a strict approach to proprietary estoppel claims and reinforces the need for strict compliance with Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 S2. "Cobb v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd" [2008] UKHL 55 (L1446550), "Hutchison v B&DF Ltd" [2008] EWHC 2286 (Ch) (L145803) and "Herbert v Doyle" [2008] EWHC 2663 (Ch).
YEOMANS ROW MANAGEMENT LTD V COBBE
HUTCHISON AND OTHERS V B & DF LTD
HERBERT V DOYLE
LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
England and Wales--1543-
Get back to basics - 2009 - Estates Gazette (0926) 4 July 2009, 108-110(3) .
Property estoppel enables claimants to go to court to seek relief, but a recent House of Lords decision makes it obvious that estoppel use is becoming unprincipled. The following decisions suggests that courts should take a strict approach to proprietary estoppel claims and reinforces the need for strict compliance with Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 S2. "Cobb v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd" [2008] UKHL 55 (L1446550), "Hutchison v B&DF Ltd" [2008] EWHC 2286 (Ch) (L145803) and "Herbert v Doyle" [2008] EWHC 2663 (Ch).
YEOMANS ROW MANAGEMENT LTD V COBBE
HUTCHISON AND OTHERS V B & DF LTD
HERBERT V DOYLE
LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
England and Wales--1543-