Get back to basics
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0926) 4 July 2009, 108-110(3)Publication details: 2009Subject(s): Summary: Property estoppel enables claimants to go to court to seek relief, but a recent House of Lords decision makes it obvious that estoppel use is becoming unprincipled. The following decisions suggests that courts should take a strict approach to proprietary estoppel claims and reinforces the need for strict compliance with Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 S2. "Cobb v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd" [2008] UKHL 55 (L1446550), "Hutchison v B&DF Ltd" [2008] EWHC 2286 (Ch) (L145803) and "Herbert v Doyle" [2008] EWHC 2663 (Ch).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L148042 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 148042-1001 |
Property estoppel enables claimants to go to court to seek relief, but a recent House of Lords decision makes it obvious that estoppel use is becoming unprincipled. The following decisions suggests that courts should take a strict approach to proprietary estoppel claims and reinforces the need for strict compliance with Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 S2. "Cobb v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd" [2008] UKHL 55 (L1446550), "Hutchison v B&DF Ltd" [2008] EWHC 2286 (Ch) (L145803) and "Herbert v Doyle" [2008] EWHC 2663 (Ch).