Scotia Plastic Binding (in administration) v London Development Agency
Scotia Plastic Binding (in administration) v London Development Agency
- 2010
[2010] UKUT 98 (LC), 12 April 2010. Consider whether claimants entitled to compensation can recover losses that they should have avoided. Claimant S's warehouse in Stratford was compulsorily purchased by respondent L in May 2006 for the Olympic Park development. L leased the property back to S giving it until June 2001 to vacate. S however moved to a new premises in Crayford in June 2006. Did S fail unreasonably to mitigate its loss of profits by moving to Crayford when it did?. Held: judgment against S. L had suggested three options located closer than to central London than Crayford . S had other options than Crayford so it could not recover losses.
SCOTIA PLASTIC BINDING (IN ADMINISTRATION) V LONDON DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND LANDS V SHUNG FUNG IRONWORKS LTD
APPLEBY & IRELAND V HAMPSHIRE CC
THE SIVAND
HARVEY V CRAWLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPN
LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973
England and Wales--1543-
[2010] UKUT 98 (LC), 12 April 2010. Consider whether claimants entitled to compensation can recover losses that they should have avoided. Claimant S's warehouse in Stratford was compulsorily purchased by respondent L in May 2006 for the Olympic Park development. L leased the property back to S giving it until June 2001 to vacate. S however moved to a new premises in Crayford in June 2006. Did S fail unreasonably to mitigate its loss of profits by moving to Crayford when it did?. Held: judgment against S. L had suggested three options located closer than to central London than Crayford . S had other options than Crayford so it could not recover losses.
SCOTIA PLASTIC BINDING (IN ADMINISTRATION) V LONDON DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND LANDS V SHUNG FUNG IRONWORKS LTD
APPLEBY & IRELAND V HAMPSHIRE CC
THE SIVAND
HARVEY V CRAWLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPN
LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973
England and Wales--1543-