Image from Google Jackets

Scotia Plastic Binding (in administration) v London Development Agency

Language: English Publication details: 2010Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2010] UKUT 98 (LC), 12 April 2010. Consider whether claimants entitled to compensation can recover losses that they should have avoided. Claimant S's warehouse in Stratford was compulsorily purchased by respondent L in May 2006 for the Olympic Park development. L leased the property back to S giving it until June 2001 to vacate. S however moved to a new premises in Crayford in June 2006. Did S fail unreasonably to mitigate its loss of profits by moving to Crayford when it did?. Held: judgment against S. L had suggested three options located closer than to central London than Crayford . S had other options than Crayford so it could not recover losses.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 151327-2001

[2010] UKUT 98 (LC), 12 April 2010. Consider whether claimants entitled to compensation can recover losses that they should have avoided. Claimant S's warehouse in Stratford was compulsorily purchased by respondent L in May 2006 for the Olympic Park development. L leased the property back to S giving it until June 2001 to vacate. S however moved to a new premises in Crayford in June 2006. Did S fail unreasonably to mitigate its loss of profits by moving to Crayford when it did?. Held: judgment against S. L had suggested three options located closer than to central London than Crayford . S had other options than Crayford so it could not recover losses.

Previous
Back to results
Next
Close