R v Tower Hamlets LBC, ex parte Chetnik
R v Tower Hamlets LBC, ex parte Chetnik
- 1988
- New Law Journal 25 March 1988, 89-90(2) .
HL 17 March 1988 The ratepayers erected two warehouses in London in 1975 and 1976. Approval to erect the buildings was subject to the consent of the local authority being obtained to any proposed use before the buildings were occupied. Tenants were not found until 1979 and 1980 and in the meantime rates of over £50,000 were paid on the unoccupied buildings . A metropolitan stipendiary magistrate held that the ratepayers were not liable to pay rates on the buildings because they were prevented from allowing them to be occupied by the user restriction and were therefore exempt from rates under General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 para 2 . The ratepayers applied for a refund of the rates already paid, but this was refused by the local authority. On the ratepayers application for judicial review , the local authority`s refusal was upheld. On appeal, CA granted judicial review. On appeal by the local authority, HL held that the discretion which a local authority has to refund or refuse to refund
RATING APPEALS
HL 17 March 1988 The ratepayers erected two warehouses in London in 1975 and 1976. Approval to erect the buildings was subject to the consent of the local authority being obtained to any proposed use before the buildings were occupied. Tenants were not found until 1979 and 1980 and in the meantime rates of over £50,000 were paid on the unoccupied buildings . A metropolitan stipendiary magistrate held that the ratepayers were not liable to pay rates on the buildings because they were prevented from allowing them to be occupied by the user restriction and were therefore exempt from rates under General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 para 2 . The ratepayers applied for a refund of the rates already paid, but this was refused by the local authority. On the ratepayers application for judicial review , the local authority`s refusal was upheld. On appeal, CA granted judicial review. On appeal by the local authority, HL held that the discretion which a local authority has to refund or refuse to refund
RATING APPEALS