Image from Google Jackets

R v Tower Hamlets LBC, ex parte Chetnik

Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 25 March 1988, 89-90(2)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: HL 17 March 1988 The ratepayers erected two warehouses in London in 1975 and 1976. Approval to erect the buildings was subject to the consent of the local authority being obtained to any proposed use before the buildings were occupied. Tenants were not found until 1979 and 1980 and in the meantime rates of over £50,000 were paid on the unoccupied buildings . A metropolitan stipendiary magistrate held that the ratepayers were not liable to pay rates on the buildings because they were prevented from allowing them to be occupied by the user restriction and were therefore exempt from rates under General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 para 2 . The ratepayers applied for a refund of the rates already paid, but this was refused by the local authority. On the ratepayers application for judicial review , the local authority`s refusal was upheld. On appeal, CA granted judicial review. On appeal by the local authority, HL held that the discretion which a local authority has to refund or refuse to refund
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS38994 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 13675-1001

HL 17 March 1988 The ratepayers erected two warehouses in London in 1975 and 1976. Approval to erect the buildings was subject to the consent of the local authority being obtained to any proposed use before the buildings were occupied. Tenants were not found until 1979 and 1980 and in the meantime rates of over £50,000 were paid on the unoccupied buildings . A metropolitan stipendiary magistrate held that the ratepayers were not liable to pay rates on the buildings because they were prevented from allowing them to be occupied by the user restriction and were therefore exempt from rates under General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 para 2 . The ratepayers applied for a refund of the rates already paid, but this was refused by the local authority. On the ratepayers application for judicial review , the local authority`s refusal was upheld. On appeal, CA granted judicial review. On appeal by the local authority, HL held that the discretion which a local authority has to refund or refuse to refund