R v Teesside Development Corporation, ex parte William Morrison Supermarket plc and Redcar and Cleveland BC (Record no. 52719)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01588cab a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | X83469 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u83469 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | R v Teesside Development Corporation, ex parte William Morrison Supermarket plc and Redcar and Cleveland BC |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1998 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Planning and Environment Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | [1998] JPL 23-48(26) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | QBD 16 May 1997. A site in an urban development area and subject to control by Teesside Development Corporation was targeted for an extensive development proposal package for residential and commercial purposes including a major food retail unit. Such a retail development was in direct breach of Policy IND7 in the Cleveland Structure Plan which nominated Middlehaven for such a development. Asda made an initial planning permission application which was approved subject to an impact assessment. This assessment showed an at least 25 per cent impact on William Morrison Supermarket`s store nearby. The corporation still resolved to support the application but Redcar and Cleveland BC opposed the development because of the conflict with the Structure Plan. They and William Morrison Supermarket plc alleged that the Corporation had lacked objectivity and prejudged the outcome of its deliberations. Application allowed. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLANNING PERMISSION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PREJUDICED |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RETAIL DEVELOPMENT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STRUCTURE PLAN |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 02/02/1998 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other/Generic Classification Scheme | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | X83469 | 83469-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |