Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth
Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; [2002] CILL 1873-1876(4)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- BALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION LTD V LAMBETH B C
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS65597 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 118429-1001 |
TCC 12 April 2002. The claimant (B) applied for summary judgement to enforce an adjudicator's decision that it was entitled to a substantial extension of time and therefore repayment of certain liquidated and ascertained damages. M argued that the adjudicator had not acted impartially, had not compiled with the principles of natural justice, and had acted in breach of contract and without jurisdiction. "Held": the courts refused to grant summary judgement on the grounds that the adjudicator had failed to give notice of the approach he intended to take.