Objection to plans
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1993) EGCS 216(1) (8/1/94)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: " R v Southwark LBC, ex parte Daniel Davies & Co" QBD 3 December 1993. Objectors to development proposals claimed they had had little warning of the meeting with the planning subcommittee and of planning officers` recommendation; also that the subcommittee had not produced earlier a draft section 106 agreement, which was decided on at the meeting. Held that the subcommittee had not acted illegally, unfairly or with indecent haste.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1262 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 15875-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
" R v Southwark LBC, ex parte Daniel Davies & Co" QBD 3 December 1993. Objectors to development proposals claimed they had had little warning of the meeting with the planning subcommittee and of planning officers` recommendation; also that the subcommittee had not produced earlier a draft section 106 agreement, which was decided on at the meeting. Held that the subcommittee had not acted illegally, unfairly or with indecent haste.