Insuring obligation
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1994) EGCS 53(1) (26/3/94)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: "Havenridge Ltd v Boston Dyers Ltd" CA 11 March 1994. At issue was whether the landlord was `properly` exercising a right to demand payment to meet an insuring obligation in the lease. The lease term `Properly` was taken to mean `legitimately` and despite the high figure in dispute, the claim was judged to have been served correctly. Decision upheld on appeal.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3013-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16851-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3012-34 Valuer`s negligence | WB3012-36 Agricultural holdings: succession | WB3013-15 Specific performance | WB3013-18 Insuring obligation | WB3013-29 Solicitor`s duty of care | WB3013-30 Vicarious liability | WB3013-31 Joint tenancy |
"Havenridge Ltd v Boston Dyers Ltd" CA 11 March 1994. At issue was whether the landlord was `properly` exercising a right to demand payment to meet an insuring obligation in the lease. The lease term `Properly` was taken to mean `legitimately` and despite the high figure in dispute, the claim was judged to have been served correctly. Decision upheld on appeal.