Henriques v Swale BC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; [1996] 36 RVR 162-165(5)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 23 May 1995. H sought compensation for refusal of consent by S to clear fell coppice woodland included in a tree preservation order. H claimed the notice of refusal did not include a valid art 5 certificate because the wording was inappropriate, the notice was not signed by the planning officer, and the issue of good forestry had not been investigated. "Held" the certificate had been properly issued.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55497 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16957-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LT 23 May 1995. H sought compensation for refusal of consent by S to clear fell coppice woodland included in a tree preservation order. H claimed the notice of refusal did not include a valid art 5 certificate because the wording was inappropriate, the notice was not signed by the planning officer, and the issue of good forestry had not been investigated. "Held" the certificate had been properly issued.