Statutory protection and the requirement for residence
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (8827) 9 July 1988, 85(1)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: If a public or private residential tenancy is to qualify for protection as a statutory or secure tenancy , the tenant must satisfy that he or she uses the property as his home . However, the language used by the two different types of tenancy is not the same and this article discusses three recent cases Crawley Borough Council v Sawyer , Islington London Borough v Ismail (1988) and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1988) (See Abstract 39345) which considered whether there is any difference between the requirements for secure and statutory tenancies and if so, to what extent.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS39504 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 17207-1001 |
If a public or private residential tenancy is to qualify for protection as a statutory or secure tenancy , the tenant must satisfy that he or she uses the property as his home . However, the language used by the two different types of tenancy is not the same and this article discusses three recent cases Crawley Borough Council v Sawyer , Islington London Borough v Ismail (1988) and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1988) (See Abstract 39345) which considered whether there is any difference between the requirements for secure and statutory tenancies and if so, to what extent.