Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd v Safeway Stores
Language: English Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWHC 60 (Ch), 27 January 2006. Considered an agreement for a lease made between K and S. The premises comprises of the basement and ground floor of Hulton House in Fleet Street, London which was to be leased by S as a small city-centre supermarket. The takeover of S by Morrisons PLC prompted the decision that the premises were no longer required. S then attempted to terminate the agreement by stating that the premises did not attain a minimum net internal area. This claim was however, disproved when the premises was measured as defined by the RICS "Code of measuring practice'. "Held" : Judgment in favour of K.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133093-1001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION National Planning Application Database | ONLINE PUBLICATION Salary Survey | ONLINE PUBLICATION Westminster City Council v Foundation and Colonnade Management Limited | ONLINE PUBLICATION Kilmartin SCI (Hulton House) Ltd v Safeway Stores | ONLINE PUBLICATION KPMG LLP v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd | ONLINE PUBLICATION Fitzroy House Epworth Street (No.1) Ltd and Fitzroy House Epworth Street (No.2) Ltd v Financial Times | ONLINE PUBLICATION Association of Residential Letting Agents [electronic resource] |
[2006] EWHC 60 (Ch), 27 January 2006. Considered an agreement for a lease made between K and S. The premises comprises of the basement and ground floor of Hulton House in Fleet Street, London which was to be leased by S as a small city-centre supermarket. The takeover of S by Morrisons PLC prompted the decision that the premises were no longer required. S then attempted to terminate the agreement by stating that the premises did not attain a minimum net internal area. This claim was however, disproved when the premises was measured as defined by the RICS "Code of measuring practice'. "Held" : Judgment in favour of K.