Crawley BC v URE
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; 1995 NPC 24Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 8 February 1995. Notice to quit by one joint tenant to a landlord is not a `positive act` requiring the joint tenant to consult the other joint tenant`s uder 226(3) of the Law of Property Act 1925 and will thus terminate the tenancy. Those acting in concert with the notifiying tenant are not therefore liabile in ort or impressed with notice of a breach of trust. NB: NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X1924 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 20381-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 8 February 1995. Notice to quit by one joint tenant to a landlord is not a `positive act` requiring the joint tenant to consult the other joint tenant`s uder 226(3) of the Law of Property Act 1925 and will thus terminate the tenancy. Those acting in concert with the notifiying tenant are not therefore liabile in ort or impressed with notice of a breach of trust. NB: NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.