House price increase
Language: English Series: Times ; 16/2/90 p34Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In Edmonds v Edmonds CA 2 February 1990 it was held that the sale of a former matrimonial home by a former wife that greatly exceeded a registrar`s valuation arrived at some months earlier, was not the occurence of a new event that invalidated the basis on which the registrar had made his order.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2608-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 21153-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2608-15 Half-price flats | WB2608-16 Private renting fashion | WB2608-17 Office blocks ease housing pressure | WB2608-18 House price increase | WB2608-19 House builder calls in receivers | WB2608-20 Housing market survey | WB2608-21 Insurance warning |
In Edmonds v Edmonds CA 2 February 1990 it was held that the sale of a former matrimonial home by a former wife that greatly exceeded a registrar`s valuation arrived at some months earlier, was not the occurence of a new event that invalidated the basis on which the registrar had made his order.