The occupation question revisited
Language: English Series: Rent Review & Lease Renewal ; 16(4) 1996, 7-14(8)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: Re-examines through "Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd" (HL ABS54198) the requirement of `occupation` of business premises by a tenant before they are able to claim a statutory renewal right. The court`s decision that a tenant loses any right to renewal if they sublet the operative parts of premises that are then used for business purposes, simplifies the law, but leaves questions of to what degree a tenant sublets.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS56228 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22063-1001 |
Re-examines through "Graysim Holdings Ltd v P&O Property Holdings Ltd" (HL ABS54198) the requirement of `occupation` of business premises by a tenant before they are able to claim a statutory renewal right. The court`s decision that a tenant loses any right to renewal if they sublet the operative parts of premises that are then used for business purposes, simplifies the law, but leaves questions of to what degree a tenant sublets.