Lloyds Bank plc v Carrick and another
Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; [1996] 4 All ER 630-642(7)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: CA 28 February 1996. AR sold her home and paid the proceeds to her brother- in-law C, in return for moving into a maisonette which he held on a long lease. Title was unregistered, and the lease remained in C`s name, whilst AR was responsible for all outgoings on the property. In 1986 C charged the property to L without telling them that AR was living there. When, in 1991, L sought repayment of monies owed and subsequent possession, C claimed he held the property as bare trustee for AR. L claimed that AR`s interest was as an unregistered estate contract and was void against L. L`s appeal against an earlier decision that there was no registrable interest, was upheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS56273 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22453-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 28 February 1996. AR sold her home and paid the proceeds to her brother- in-law C, in return for moving into a maisonette which he held on a long lease. Title was unregistered, and the lease remained in C`s name, whilst AR was responsible for all outgoings on the property. In 1986 C charged the property to L without telling them that AR was living there. When, in 1991, L sought repayment of monies owed and subsequent possession, C claimed he held the property as bare trustee for AR. L claimed that AR`s interest was as an unregistered estate contract and was void against L. L`s appeal against an earlier decision that there was no registrable interest, was upheld.