Agricultural occupancy
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 33 (1) (4/3/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Retter v SoS Environment and another" QBD 20 February 1995. R appealed against refusal of planning permission for a dwelling on site as essential to the needs of agriculture. The inspector found that it was not an agricultural enterprise and therefore PPG7 Annex E did not apply. Appeal not allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3110-42 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 22757-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3109-60 Lie of the land | WB3110-15 Disputed compensation | WB3110-35 Lease restored to full existence | WB3110-42 Agricultural occupancy | WB3110-43 Green belt | WB3110-44 Power to call in planning applications | WB3110-51 Negligent valuations |
"Retter v SoS Environment and another" QBD 20 February 1995. R appealed against refusal of planning permission for a dwelling on site as essential to the needs of agriculture. The inspector found that it was not an agricultural enterprise and therefore PPG7 Annex E did not apply. Appeal not allowed.