Permitted development
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1993 EGCS 49 20 March 1993(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: "Cotswold District Council v SoS for the Environment and another" QBD 9 March 1993 centred on the fact that the planning inspector had proceeded on the basis that the `fence` in question was either a windbreak or an enclosure but not both and did not consider what classification it should be given. The appeal succeeded because the inspector did not determine whether the structure was a building and thoroughly identifying it under all aspects of the 1988 GDO.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2912-59 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 24206-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2912-47 Mortgagee failed to apply in time | WB2912-48 Rent-free deal created tenancy | WB2912-58 Change of use | WB2912-59 Permitted development | WB2913-20 Sunday trading ban | WB2913-24 Breach of covenant | WB2913-25 Rent : arrears |
"Cotswold District Council v SoS for the Environment and another" QBD 9 March 1993 centred on the fact that the planning inspector had proceeded on the basis that the `fence` in question was either a windbreak or an enclosure but not both and did not consider what classification it should be given. The appeal succeeded because the inspector did not determine whether the structure was a building and thoroughly identifying it under all aspects of the 1988 GDO.